Category - Unspecified

[Wellard]

I know that this has been suggested many, many times but maybe if enough ABs support this latest move, maybe the powers-that-be will take notice. We all have many questions that do not fit into the specified topics - or could be on the fringe of a few and in the end the are not posted because we are not happy with the heading. WHY can`t we have a heading = Unspecified or sundry or misc. or whatever. We do not care if they are then moved to a more appropriate site.

[Buenchico]

The problem is that 'Unspecified' would almost certainly become the new 'Chatterbank'.

I'm not taking sides in the pro- and anti-Chatterbank argument. I simply accept that the people who run this site came to the decision that CB was 'more trouble than it was worth'. It seems unrealistic to expect them to allow it to reappear under another name.

Chris

[AB Editor]

Hi Wellard - thank you for the suggestion. If we get the subcategories right, we shouldn't need an 'unspecified' category - though I understand your point - and Buenchico's. We also want to limit the time spent on moving questions about. Thank you!