Crosswords0 min ago
Plymouth Rock Vandalised.
Something else to get worked up about I know, but isn't sickening? By contrast we are watching BBC 2's Michael Portillo's Rail Journeys in the Far East each evening & the one thing so noticeable wherever he goes in rich or poor areas, is how clean and everything is; no graffiti or litter, why is this?
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ video/s quare-v ideo-pl ymouth- rock-gr afitti- 001-mp4 -119367 39
https:/
Answers
Graffiti seems to be encouraged these days; maybe it's a woke thing or something. So what can we expect ? Society deterioratin g: wonder which "civilisatio n" will take over next.
18:55 Tue 18th Feb 2020
the Pilgrim Fathers didn't land there, so it's just another lump of stone
https:/ /blogs. scienti ficamer ican.co m/roset ta-ston es/the- real-st ory-of- plymout h-rock/
https:/
The Pilgrim fathers also didn't sail from the Mayflower Steps in Plymouth. Rather, it was from a location that is under the ladies loo in a nearby pub...
https:/ /www.pl ymouthh erald.c o.uk/ne ws/surp rising- true-lo cation- mayflow er-step s-31155 02
https:/
Woofgang I'd say it is graffiti.
If I went to stone henge and carved my name and date into it that would be considered graffiti.
Same if I went to the local town and carved my name into a paving slab that would also be considered graffiti.
Obviously when the pilgrims landed this was monumental and to mark that and where and when, they carved the stone? That would be Graffiti. If someone carved it later with permission or even by request, then it would not be graffiti.
If I went to stone henge and carved my name and date into it that would be considered graffiti.
Same if I went to the local town and carved my name into a paving slab that would also be considered graffiti.
Obviously when the pilgrims landed this was monumental and to mark that and where and when, they carved the stone? That would be Graffiti. If someone carved it later with permission or even by request, then it would not be graffiti.
no doubt, Khandro, but Plymouth Rock isn't supposed to be a memorial to something that happened elsewhere, it's supposed to be the actual site.
https:/ /sfpnn. com/Tra velbyPa tty/1Pa tty2010 /PLYMOU TH%20RO CK/Plym outhSig n.JPG
But early visitors to the site were invited to chop off chunks for themselves
https:/ /americ anhisto ry.si.e du/coll ections /search /object /nmah_5 23279
https:/
But early visitors to the site were invited to chop off chunks for themselves
https:/
September this year marks the 400th anniversary of the sailing of the Mayflower from Plymouth. It might be someone trying to gain publicity for some cause in the light of that. Besides, there is no proof that Plymouth Rock was the first place that the founding fathers set foot in America. It's just an educated guess.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.