Spectator N0 2680 : "Two Of A...
Crosswords1 min ago
Retired Cop Killer Arrested
I wonder if Piers Morgan will call this killer's attorney 'a disgrace' for representing him when he faces a Murder 1 charge.Would he wish to deny this killer due process as well the Police Officer on a Murder 2 charge?
https:/
https:/
https:/
https:/
Answers
1 to 20 of 20
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by retrocop. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I bet Morgan didn't call his lawyer a disgrace when he got him off a phone hacking charge yet he seems to think justice is served by rationing legal representation to his favoured hobby horse. An ignorant and rude useless media presenter. No wonder the Americans kicked him out. I hope the Americans have enough sense to accept we are not all like him. :-(
as we know form Prince Andy - these 'trials' are conducted in public, in the Land of the Free
In dear old blighty we have "advice to Editors" which are pretty strict - once someone is charged, comment is limited to statements like "there was a court hearing" - and rules on contempt of court.
Of course someone has a right to a defence
nonetheless the extent of discourse and permissible areas are much wider in America and Piers Moron knows that
I think the attorney was expecting some sort of soft powder puff insisting "I say this is TOO much...." and got a shock.
See Randy Andy's counsel who havent even mentioned the fifth amendment = whilst madarm from LA was shrieking (*) that Prince Andrew hgas to come and tell us the truth and damn the consequences for him
sozza - this is a very long comment about Law and may not be understood by everyone
(*) o lardy dah the interview about Prince Andy was like a scene played out in AB
In dear old blighty we have "advice to Editors" which are pretty strict - once someone is charged, comment is limited to statements like "there was a court hearing" - and rules on contempt of court.
Of course someone has a right to a defence
nonetheless the extent of discourse and permissible areas are much wider in America and Piers Moron knows that
I think the attorney was expecting some sort of soft powder puff insisting "I say this is TOO much...." and got a shock.
See Randy Andy's counsel who havent even mentioned the fifth amendment = whilst madarm from LA was shrieking (*) that Prince Andrew hgas to come and tell us the truth and damn the consequences for him
sozza - this is a very long comment about Law and may not be understood by everyone
(*) o lardy dah the interview about Prince Andy was like a scene played out in AB
Murder 3 which we call gross negligence manslaughter would be more likely
there is no clear intent to injure which clears all murder charges so we are left with manslaughter
is death foreseeable if you kneel on someones neck - yes
is it reckless to continue if people are saying he is dying - yes
so that at least will get up and run ( in English law)
a jury wont convict - and I think the Minnesota movement - Time to start again - is probably the way forward
trump is not showing well so far
there is no clear intent to injure which clears all murder charges so we are left with manslaughter
is death foreseeable if you kneel on someones neck - yes
is it reckless to continue if people are saying he is dying - yes
so that at least will get up and run ( in English law)
a jury wont convict - and I think the Minnesota movement - Time to start again - is probably the way forward
trump is not showing well so far
I must say I thought ( in dear old blighty ) that killing in defence of property was a defence under charges to the Offences against property act 1861 as amended
and it all depended on the facts
there was a case about it a few years ago - clearly a bit extreme etc etc
I just cant bring myself ( fainting violet day for me to day) to wade froo all the aggression and emotion to discern the facts of the case
did any one see the billy bunter from the Police Fed
saying - - "rioting - foo ! dat not a safe envirnoment to police - they shoulda stayed at home - the police that is!"
and then it was back to his plate of cream buns
and it all depended on the facts
there was a case about it a few years ago - clearly a bit extreme etc etc
I just cant bring myself ( fainting violet day for me to day) to wade froo all the aggression and emotion to discern the facts of the case
did any one see the billy bunter from the Police Fed
saying - - "rioting - foo ! dat not a safe envirnoment to police - they shoulda stayed at home - the police that is!"
and then it was back to his plate of cream buns
"So Piers Morgan thinks that legal representation should be excluded from a person charged with with murder? The man is a moron"
hence Piers Moron...as hes known to a lot of people.
Hes like that other piece of garbage Jeremy Kyle, he knows exactly what hes doing and how to get his audience hooked...but like JK he will eventually overstep the mark and they will get rid of him, and he knows it....he wont care though hes wealthy
hence Piers Moron...as hes known to a lot of people.
Hes like that other piece of garbage Jeremy Kyle, he knows exactly what hes doing and how to get his audience hooked...but like JK he will eventually overstep the mark and they will get rid of him, and he knows it....he wont care though hes wealthy
Piers Morgan knows two things very well -
One is the right of every accused individual in a democracy, to have a fair trial which includes adequate legal representation.
The other is -
How to say stupid things on television that chime with a vast, ignorant and easily pumped up viewing audience, and increase ratings for his show.
He is perfectly willing to ignore his knowledge and approval of one in order to assist the other.
One is the right of every accused individual in a democracy, to have a fair trial which includes adequate legal representation.
The other is -
How to say stupid things on television that chime with a vast, ignorant and easily pumped up viewing audience, and increase ratings for his show.
He is perfectly willing to ignore his knowledge and approval of one in order to assist the other.
1 to 20 of 20
Latest Posts
ChatterBank3 mins ago
Spam & Scams8 mins ago
Vacuum Cleaner For Dog Hair...
Home & Garden9 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.