Atheist - // AH; 22:00
You'll really have a go at me for this, but...
When the slave trade was in full swing, the bosses and skippers treated their 'animals' in a similar way to the way that good vets, farmers etc do to what we now call animals. They had respect for them and treated them as well as they could; but they were realistic and they did need to make a living and so they do put them down if necessary, and they sent them off to lifelong servitude. If there wasn't a taboo against cannibalism, they would probably have fattened and slaughtered them if it paid. To suggest that non-human animals deserve some respect similar to what I think human animals deserve will no doubt be greeted with derision by some here. But I prefer my viewpoint to that of some religious people who believe that man was given dominion over the animals by god. //
I would not dispute your post in any way.
I entirely agree that slaves were regarded simple as a commodity, and treating them well enough to keep them alive was based entirely on economics rather than any sense of humanity.
The ethics of treating human beings in this way is for another debate on another day, but insofar as this thread is discussing attitudes to animals, either as economic products or as pets, then I would agree with what you have said.