Greta And Climate Change.

[10ClarionSt]

My response in the Greta thread was removed, for some reason. I said that climate change was natural. The Earth is still emerging from the last ice age and is warming up naturally. One example of this can be seen on Romney Marsh, which is gradually sinking into the sea. This is due to a geological process called post-glacial bounce back, where the mountains in the north of the UK are still rising after being covered with huge glaciers. As they gradually rise, they drag down the extremities and this can be seen on Romney Marsh. The sun is the main factor with climate change, along with volcanoes. How do you stop either from affecting the planet?

[Togo]

//I too have had battles Royal with folks giving out wrong legal advice and interpretation to such an extent I no longer get involved in such threads.//

Bet some of us can guess who you refer to. Doesn't stay in Law either.

[shoota]

The main one does spread himself around a bit...

[Spicerack]

I think Jim and the ABed should get their heads together and present a paper to the Nobel committee.
It'll be a shoo-in for the last Nobel prize in science.

[Togo]

Shhh......very vindictive as well. (*_*)

[Togo]

You can actually put it all to bed in your head if you consider this. The leftie luvv bugs took 1984 as a template for operational procedure whilst the rest of us were taking it as a warning and the eco vampire wights read Michael Chrichton's State Of Fear, and used the pdseudo science conjured up within as a base line to build from. Ohhh and the Animal rights/disney believers think that his Jurassic Park is fact and that our glow bulls killed the dinasaurs.

[jim360]

It's a pity that you've gone off on a tangent. You posted a source, I've commented on it (both by posting somebody else's rebuttal and from my own observations), and your only response has been to attack the site, rather than the comments.

Have you anything to say about those comments, or is your only strategy to attack the commentators?

[Togo]

//Have you anything to say about those comments, or is your only strategy to attack the commentators?//

One has to do what one can......in the absence of the means to get the comments removed because they affect my acute sensibilities.

[shoota]

This is Chatterbank in which discussion may morph and diverge...

[jim360]

I'm sure you can do a lot better Togo.

[AB Editor]

// How do you check what is "unfounded information"? Are you going to analyse every post in the Science section and compare it with the latest hypotheses? //

Of course not, we're not scientists. But if someone comes in saying climate change isn't real or the coronavirus is a hoax or that actually, injecting ourselves with bleach is a good idea after all, that would have previously been allowed under Site Rules and we wanted to enable our moderators to shut down blatant and potentially dangerous falsehoods.