Religion & Spirituality2 mins ago
Was This Inevitable?
11 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by piggynose. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//We want to be clear that we are not attempting to remove history, but rather are removing a piece of a window from the sacred space within the Cathedral that does not reflect our Christian values. We believe this action can yet have a second life as an effective teaching tool in a context yet to be determined.///
” //Lee will be replaced with a person of color, though the church has yet to determine who that will be. The project will cost about $26,000, the church said.//
One can hardly imagine who that 'person of colour' relacement may be.
I hope it is not Floyd.After all sticking a loaded firearm arm into the stomach of a pregnant ,terrified woman while you ransack her house hardly 'reflects Christian values' or does the church believe God loves a sinner?
” //Lee will be replaced with a person of color, though the church has yet to determine who that will be. The project will cost about $26,000, the church said.//
One can hardly imagine who that 'person of colour' relacement may be.
I hope it is not Floyd.After all sticking a loaded firearm arm into the stomach of a pregnant ,terrified woman while you ransack her house hardly 'reflects Christian values' or does the church believe God loves a sinner?
It is their window, and their choice what fills it.
It would have been better had they done as Aberrant suggests, and steered clear of historical figures rather than non-confrontational religious ones.
It's worth considering that in removing one unsuitable image, they may well be replacing it with another unsuitable image, because, by trying to convince everyone how woke they are, they are singling out another secular figure which really has no place in this setting.
Why not find a saint and pop him or her in there, and stop trying to convince everyone that the church is not racist.
It's a church for heaven's (!!) sake - surely anyone who is remotely interested in it can take a position of anti-racism as read?
It would have been better had they done as Aberrant suggests, and steered clear of historical figures rather than non-confrontational religious ones.
It's worth considering that in removing one unsuitable image, they may well be replacing it with another unsuitable image, because, by trying to convince everyone how woke they are, they are singling out another secular figure which really has no place in this setting.
Why not find a saint and pop him or her in there, and stop trying to convince everyone that the church is not racist.
It's a church for heaven's (!!) sake - surely anyone who is remotely interested in it can take a position of anti-racism as read?