ChatterBank3 mins ago
Exams Fiasco
43 Answers
Thank goodness all the students caught up in the exams fiasco will be old enough to vote in the next general election.
Hope they all remember the chaos, stress and life changing results that have been inflicted on them by the useless Conservatives.
Hope they all remember the chaos, stress and life changing results that have been inflicted on them by the useless Conservatives.
Answers
// Unfortunately teacher grading and 'mocks' are notoriously wrong.//
This is often cited, and I don't quibble with it per se, but I think there's a basic lack of discussion about *why* they are wrong. With maybe some exceptions, it isn't because teachers are just being nice for no logical reason, or because they are making things up. It's also because exams themselves are a pretty terrible way of assessing how good somebody is at a subject, so predicting the result is not just about how well that student knows their stuff but also about how they'll cope under time pressure -- which, itself, may be due to random factors utterly beyond the teacher's ability to predict or control for. And, even setting aside, the exceptional, what is the "correct" prediction for someone who has produced work graded as BBABBBBCBB in their last ten papers? I'd assume it would be "B", given they hit that grade 8 times out of ten. But the student showed themselves capable, on a good day, of hitting an A, and on a bad day of getting a C. Was the exam sat on a "good" day or a "bad" one? The teacher can't know. Is it the teacher's "fault" for being optimistic (or pessimistic)?
The idea that reducing a summary of a student's ability to a single letter could ever have been effective is a conceit, one that society really ought to abandon.
This is often cited, and I don't quibble with it per se, but I think there's a basic lack of discussion about *why* they are wrong. With maybe some exceptions, it isn't because teachers are just being nice for no logical reason, or because they are making things up. It's also because exams themselves are a pretty terrible way of assessing how good somebody is at a subject, so predicting the result is not just about how well that student knows their stuff but also about how they'll cope under time pressure -- which, itself, may be due to random factors utterly beyond the teacher's ability to predict or control for. And, even setting aside, the exceptional, what is the "correct" prediction for someone who has produced work graded as BBABBBBCBB in their last ten papers? I'd assume it would be "B", given they hit that grade 8 times out of ten. But the student showed themselves capable, on a good day, of hitting an A, and on a bad day of getting a C. Was the exam sat on a "good" day or a "bad" one? The teacher can't know. Is it the teacher's "fault" for being optimistic (or pessimistic)?
The idea that reducing a summary of a student's ability to a single letter could ever have been effective is a conceit, one that society really ought to abandon.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.