// wrong thread pp? sometimes it's hard to tell//
erm the expected answer is
"foo no yeah name calling!" x 1000
BUT
if you read this page VERY carefully - you may need to put your glallies on ! you will read:
"However, it is a legal mine field when writing fiction about something that happened "
you will see that artemus jones - name real event fictitous
and Conrad Black - name real and event fictitious but then amusingly and ironically he DOES get convicted
and Rawlie - the minister and the massacres involved a libel case involveing a million ( knicker than is) damages and everyone who knew about Yalta ( me and a whole load of DPs who didnt speak english ) knew it is true
and so and so
you can see that they are three illustrations of the danger of writing about veiled things where the plaintiff says - oi that's me, monty please !
which was the point of Barmaids post
it all makes sense if you read it