Gaming2 mins ago
Covid19 New Restrictions
Looks like we are going to have a 4Tier system.
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-8 936191/ Governm ent-con siders- changin g-anti- Covid-t ier-Dec ember-2 .html?i to=push -notifi cation& amp;ci= 50091&a mp;si=1 9856889
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by dannyk13. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.the 16:05 post yesterday said how infection numbers were level and the figures had reached a plateu of around 20000 a day and rubbished the graphs which led to lockdown. Well a wonder what the spin is on are latest UK surge to over 34000 cases in a day.
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-54908 680
Are deaths figure is the highest in Europe so clearly restrictions are actualy to weak and to many are ignoring them?
https:/
Are deaths figure is the highest in Europe so clearly restrictions are actualy to weak and to many are ignoring them?
//Well a wonder what the spin is on are latest UK surge to over 34000 cases in a day.//
There's no spin. I have never said that the disease will not spread. On the contrary my entire argument since it began is that it will spread unless everybody is confined to their homes 24/7. I mentioned the steadiness of the infections at around 22k or so because I was very surprised. I expected them to be much higher once the 20k level was reached. This is especially so since more testing is being undertaken. Lockdown 2.0 has been in operation for a week now and if it is to bear fruit the rates should begin to decline. I believe that they will not (as they did not in Wales) because locking down the entire country is not the way to deal with this. So for the record, as far as infection rates go, I'm not surprised they have increased, I will be far from surprised if they continue to increase, despite lockdown. But they may vary from time to time.
The graphs shown a couple of weeks ago were and still are rubbish (even their authors have said as much). They forecast 4,000 daily deaths by the end of this month and they should have reached well over 1,000 by now. And they haven't (although today's death figures have not yet been published).
There's no spin. I have never said that the disease will not spread. On the contrary my entire argument since it began is that it will spread unless everybody is confined to their homes 24/7. I mentioned the steadiness of the infections at around 22k or so because I was very surprised. I expected them to be much higher once the 20k level was reached. This is especially so since more testing is being undertaken. Lockdown 2.0 has been in operation for a week now and if it is to bear fruit the rates should begin to decline. I believe that they will not (as they did not in Wales) because locking down the entire country is not the way to deal with this. So for the record, as far as infection rates go, I'm not surprised they have increased, I will be far from surprised if they continue to increase, despite lockdown. But they may vary from time to time.
The graphs shown a couple of weeks ago were and still are rubbish (even their authors have said as much). They forecast 4,000 daily deaths by the end of this month and they should have reached well over 1,000 by now. And they haven't (although today's death figures have not yet been published).
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.