Indeed.
The silly thing is, as jim has alluded to, the fact that the count has taken so long ought to reassure unbiased folk that the postal votes were, actually, being dealt with honourably and fairly.
I am not a fan of postal ballots, personally: I understand why people don't like them. No doubt the Democrats made an electorally tactical decision in part to encourage them, but that doesn't seem to be anything illegal or nefarious.
Ironically just about all the states where there is contention had ballot arrangements sanctioned by local Republican officials, and to their credit, as should befit the Grand Old Party, they seem to have carried out their duties well.