So Caring Not!

[teacake44]

Eamonn Holmes and his dear Ruth come across so caring for everyone on TV, yet I see today Eamonn is now advertising, and pushing equity release for the aged. Still not happy with the amount of money they've earned between them, they have to stoop this low to get more.

[teacake44]

I tried in vain to explain again. As for personal animosity you need to review you're own post of, 14.47 @ Dec 2nd

[andy-hughes]

teacake - I understood your explanation, but as I pointed out, it's not valid because your argument is flawed, in my view.

Maybe you can address my question now?

[teacake44]

Its only flawed in you're view, that's not going to concern me, or change my opinion on anything in my OP or any of my posts.

[andy-hughes]

teacake - // ts only flawed in you're view, that's not going to concern me, or change my opinion on anything in my OP or any of my posts. //

I find your unwillingness to simply accept that your stance has altered bewildering - added to your constant animosity and willingness for confrontation.

It's clear you don't wish to engage with me in any meaningful fashion on this thread, so I will leave you to it, convinced you are correct - and if that makes you happy, then that's fine by me.

[teacake44]

A bit like you're unwillingness to accept you're animosity, and ignore, 14.47 Dec 2nd.

[andy-hughes]

teacake - // A bit like you're unwillingness to accept you're animosity, and ignore, 14.47 Dec 2nd. //

That was not on this thread, so I have no idea what are you are talking about, and I am not keen to facilitate further derailing by asking you to find it and re-print it here.

That would be derailing, and no-one wants that.

[teacake44]

That was not on this thread?? Page 4, Wednesday 2nd Dec, @ 14.47.

[andy-hughes]

Apologies, found it now.

I don't believe that what I said was horrendously offensive, but it clearly upset you far more than I intended.

On that basis, I am happy to apologise for any offence caused.

[teacake44]

Apology accepted! But answers have been removed for a lot less.

[THECORBYLOON]

Did you report the offending post?

[teacake44]

Irrelevant now in my view.

[andy-hughes]

Well, the report facility is there, and contrary to posts that are as stupid as they are repetitive, I don't get special treatment, I am subject to the Rules like everyone else, I do sometimes go too far, and my posts do get removed.

[Paigntonian]

Thought it ironic that they did a TV series about how the rich live when they've millions themselves. It's the Wogan trick. Pretend you're like ordinary folk when you've got millions.

[THECORBYLOON]

That'll be "no" then.

If you believe the Mods have overlooked an offending post, especially one affecting you, why would you not report it?

[andy-hughes]

Wigan's problem was, his self-deprecation was entirely false and manufactured, and his inability to stop trowelling it on showed it up for the cynical sham it always was.

[andy-hughes]

Wigan????
Flaming autocorrect!!

[teacake44]

12.41 TCL, there is moderate remarks and excessive, so in other words unless its excessive, I don't have a big romance for the report button. I'm going to leave it there now. but thanks for you're input.

[andy-hughes]

Mind you, if it had corrected to Wigon, I'd have left that in!!

[andy-hughes]

teacake - // 12.41 TCL, there is moderate remarks and excessive, so in other words unless its excessive, I don't have a big romance for the report button. //

If I was offended enough about a post to still be griping about it two days later, more than once - I'd have reported it at the time.

Either something said is rude enough to be reported, or it's not, trying to have it both ways merely looks petulant, which is what I pointed out at the time.