I cannot see the problem here as if the photograph wouldn't identify the woman involved and also everyone is aware of the appearance of the area involved.
I must say I cannot see what all the fuss is about.
Well that will be why the majority of us feel the way we do about this business, Gness, as there are probably very few women out there who have not, at some point in their lives, had someone be inappropriate with them at least once. It's not one of Sqad's finest moments but I do think there is an element of baiting going on here.
I'm not sure I want the answer to this, sqad... but if your point is simply that she hasn't been publicly identified, so it's harmless (?)....
How about filming children getting changed, pixellating faces, selling on... would that be ok, if nobody is identified and the victims never know?
perhaps if mrs sqad doesnt think taking a picture of a teenager's fanny against her will and without her permission is a big deal, she has been too used to the shizz sqad has doled out over the years to her.
Would you be able to see what the "fuss" was about if your son was arrested and jailed for such an offence?
It's not just women and girls, Sunny-dave. I had a very unpleasant experience with my male piano teacher when I was 9. A male relative of mine was a victim of Marcus Marcussen, a teacher who was jailed in 2015 at the age of 91 for historic sexual abuse of his boy pupils.