ChatterBank3 mins ago
Well Done M'lud!
29 Answers
https:/
Now, send us Sacoolas and you can have Assange!
Now, send us Sacoolas and you can have Assange!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Yes Sweden is no longer pursuing extradition but the point was still valid while they did.
As for the “good” Assange did, we also know a lot about Russian mischief in its backyard thanks to his abetting the Manning theft of US diplomatic cables. Such theft as well as being illegal inhibits the vital flow of confidential diplomatic channels.
But theft it is.
The reason I don’t support his extradition is because the charges of treason (if that’s what they are) feel odd aimed at an Australian citizen. The chief culprit is already behind bars. All this will do is undeservedly raise his already overblown status in the minds of the gullible
As for the “good” Assange did, we also know a lot about Russian mischief in its backyard thanks to his abetting the Manning theft of US diplomatic cables. Such theft as well as being illegal inhibits the vital flow of confidential diplomatic channels.
But theft it is.
The reason I don’t support his extradition is because the charges of treason (if that’s what they are) feel odd aimed at an Australian citizen. The chief culprit is already behind bars. All this will do is undeservedly raise his already overblown status in the minds of the gullible
"The proceedings began in 2012 and on 12 August 2015, Swedish prosecutors announced that they would drop their investigation into three of the allegations against Assange, because of the expiration of the statute of limitations." [wikiP]"
""The reason for this decision is that the evidence has weakened considerably due to the long period of time that has elapsed since the events in question," Swedish Deputy Director of Public Prosecution Eva-Marie Persson said, "The reason for this decision is that the evidence has weakened considerably due to the long period of time that has elapsed since the events in question,"... Ms Persson said: "I would like to emphasise that the injured party has submitted a credible and reliable version of events." ??
[ nothing to do with the Swedish 10 year statute of limitations. honest ] https:/
Please do ring the bell for this "bunch of British investigators in Leicestershire, who have exposed the nefarious acts of true rogue states" ichkeria, so we can personally evaluate their merit.
""The reason for this decision is that the evidence has weakened considerably due to the long period of time that has elapsed since the events in question," Swedish Deputy Director of Public Prosecution Eva-Marie Persson said, "The reason for this decision is that the evidence has weakened considerably due to the long period of time that has elapsed since the events in question,"... Ms Persson said: "I would like to emphasise that the injured party has submitted a credible and reliable version of events." ??
[ nothing to do with the Swedish 10 year statute of limitations. honest ] https:/
Please do ring the bell for this "bunch of British investigators in Leicestershire, who have exposed the nefarious acts of true rogue states" ichkeria, so we can personally evaluate their merit.
