I had a story idea - an alternate version of the postwar era. Then a Graphic Novel ( Ministery of Space ) came out and it was practically everything I wanted to write!
It raised an interesting point - especially after the Dan Brown Court Case. If ( for the sake of argument ) i wrote my story just how different would it have to be in order to avoid plagiarism charges ?
I think most plagiarism cases have involved taking chunks of actual prose rather than just working on the same ideas (which is what Dan Brown did). But that leaves a big grey area, which it would be up to a court to decide on. Plagiarism isn't a charge in the sense of being a criminal offence; I think it's more a civil matter where another author would sue you for breach of copyright.
This is very interesting....although quite different.
I had thought of all the energy which is generated by people just walking along the pavement and how it could be harnessed to mechanically create enough electricity to power something -and I heard a BBC4 radio programme covering the subject of energy which underlined a project designed to create the same thing I imagined!
I am sorry if that bored you but it was a fact and not quite an 'intellectual property' issue
I was watching a programme about hurricanes and they casually tossed in that the hurricane generates huge amounts of power . Imagine harnesing that - however it would be a bit of a techical marvel if it was possible,