Quizzes & Puzzles77 mins ago
Calling All Men - Have You Ever Raped A Woman?
I've never raped a woman.
I've also never murdered a woman, abused a woman or harassed a woman.
None of those things have ever entered my mind, but it turns out I have the "potential" to do all of those things and I should be feared.
Never mind though, I can't go to a non-essential shop or a pub because I will start a zombie apocalypse, but if I was in possession of a vagina, I could go to a completely non-socially distanced vigil.
Am I the only one that is a little offended by how my sex is being defined?
I've also never murdered a woman, abused a woman or harassed a woman.
None of those things have ever entered my mind, but it turns out I have the "potential" to do all of those things and I should be feared.
Never mind though, I can't go to a non-essential shop or a pub because I will start a zombie apocalypse, but if I was in possession of a vagina, I could go to a completely non-socially distanced vigil.
Am I the only one that is a little offended by how my sex is being defined?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Deskdiary. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I put this on another thread earlier.
Im just fed up with the whole issue.
30% of murders are women. So 70% of murders are men%.
Why, oh why has this murder been treated any differently to others. Because the murderer was a police officer! It got more media coverage. All murders whether to men or women are awful. Murders are happening all the time, and men are just as vulnerable or more vulnerable perhaps to be the victim of a murder by someone stronger or nastier than themselves. We all need to protect ourselves as best we can. We simply can't have a set of rules for women or for men. I am in my seventies, have led an eventful life, particularly in my younger days. I was aware of keeping myself as safe as possible, but I never considered that men should be seen as a possible threat. There are threats to all groups of people. That is what life is all about. It can't be policed. Women want equality, but this seems to be all about labelling men as a possible danger.
And what happened last night was dreadful. Dreadful that these protesters decided to do exactly what they wanted and ignore the safety of others (from possible Covid).
I would never expect a man to cross the road because he feels awkward about walking behind me!
Im just fed up with the whole issue.
30% of murders are women. So 70% of murders are men%.
Why, oh why has this murder been treated any differently to others. Because the murderer was a police officer! It got more media coverage. All murders whether to men or women are awful. Murders are happening all the time, and men are just as vulnerable or more vulnerable perhaps to be the victim of a murder by someone stronger or nastier than themselves. We all need to protect ourselves as best we can. We simply can't have a set of rules for women or for men. I am in my seventies, have led an eventful life, particularly in my younger days. I was aware of keeping myself as safe as possible, but I never considered that men should be seen as a possible threat. There are threats to all groups of people. That is what life is all about. It can't be policed. Women want equality, but this seems to be all about labelling men as a possible danger.
And what happened last night was dreadful. Dreadful that these protesters decided to do exactly what they wanted and ignore the safety of others (from possible Covid).
I would never expect a man to cross the road because he feels awkward about walking behind me!
Female staff at a McDonalds in London reported a man, twice, indecently exposing himself to the female workers in the store. There was CCTV of both incidents. The police were called, the culprit talked to by the local cops and let go, only to murder Sarah Everard a couple of days later.
I’m sure lessons will be learnt blah blah blah.
I’m sure lessons will be learnt blah blah blah.
CrapAtCryptics
// Lets not forget that the vigil was illegal, a judge having already ruled it could not take place //
Except that is NOT what happened on Friday. The High Court Judge decided that the legislation and guidance made absolutely no sense, and he was unable to determine either way whether it was illegal or not.
The Met Police then decided to ban the vigils not because they were illegal, but because they ‘might be’ unlawful. The Met also refused the help of voluntary wardens to help implement social distancing.
// Lets not forget that the vigil was illegal, a judge having already ruled it could not take place //
Except that is NOT what happened on Friday. The High Court Judge decided that the legislation and guidance made absolutely no sense, and he was unable to determine either way whether it was illegal or not.
The Met Police then decided to ban the vigils not because they were illegal, but because they ‘might be’ unlawful. The Met also refused the help of voluntary wardens to help implement social distancing.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.