Road rules2 mins ago
Road Crossing
9 Answers
I would like to contact the correct authorities to request a crossing to be placed on a busy road near to where my new house is. The road is quite long and you have to walk quite a distance either way to get to a crossing. Across the other side of this road, the school my son will be going to, can be seen behind a small area of woodland. There is a bus stop on our side of the road near to where he would cross but this causes a blind spot for traffic coming from the other side. I will take him to and from school until he is confident to go by himself. My concern is him trying to cross this road during busy times.
I'm not sure who it is that I should contact. The council or transport for London? Would I have to start a petition?
I'm not sure who it is that I should contact. The council or transport for London? Would I have to start a petition?
Answers
1 to 9 of 9
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by tiggerblue10. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Enter your postcode here to find the relevant authority to submit your request to:
https:/
https:/
If your road is a "Red Route" it's TfL. If not, your local Council. Red Routes here:
https:/
https:/
One of the problems with persuading a local authority to install a crossing is that the mathematical models that are used in assessing the need for a crossing often require that lots of people must already be crossing at or near the relevant point. If only a few people want to cross there the criteria won't be met but equally, if thousands of people would like to cross there (but simply can't because it's presently far too dangerous) then the number of people using any potential crossing will falsely appear to be low to merit the installation of one.
The basic test that many local authorities apply is the PV² one. They count the number of vehicles using the road over an hour and square that number. They then multiply that figure by the number of pedestrians crossing a 100m stretch of the road at that location, to arrive at a 'PV²' figure. (In practice they actually do that across the day and then take the average of the four busiest hours). If the PV² figure is less than 20 million, then it is assumed that no crossing is required. If the PV² figure is above 20 million, then further investigation is undertaken.
One doesn't have to be Einstein to see where some of the flaws in that model might lie. If, for example, there is a peak half hour period in the morning (where there are loads of kids crossing the road on their way to school, just as there are loads of commuters going to work) and a peak ten minute period in the afternoon (when there all of the kids come out of school simultaneously but commuter road traffic hasn't started to build up for the evening peak), taking the average of the four busiest full-hour periods over the day (when there aren't actually many people crossing the road for most of the time) is unlikely to yield a sufficiently high PV² figure to merit the installation of a crossing.
Some authorities are now moving away from solely using a 'raw' PV² model, and weighting their figures to take account of the types of pedestrians involved (e.g. unaccompanied children, elderly people, pedestrian with pushchairs, etc) and other factors, such as the proximity of any proposed crossing to a school. However, with financial constraints pressing down upon them, council officials can still be tempted to use PV² as a justification for turning down a crossing request.
I suggest that, as well as contacting council officials, you should directly contact the council itself. (i.e. don't just write to the council offices. Find out who the local councillors are for that area and ask them each to support your campaign).
The basic test that many local authorities apply is the PV² one. They count the number of vehicles using the road over an hour and square that number. They then multiply that figure by the number of pedestrians crossing a 100m stretch of the road at that location, to arrive at a 'PV²' figure. (In practice they actually do that across the day and then take the average of the four busiest hours). If the PV² figure is less than 20 million, then it is assumed that no crossing is required. If the PV² figure is above 20 million, then further investigation is undertaken.
One doesn't have to be Einstein to see where some of the flaws in that model might lie. If, for example, there is a peak half hour period in the morning (where there are loads of kids crossing the road on their way to school, just as there are loads of commuters going to work) and a peak ten minute period in the afternoon (when there all of the kids come out of school simultaneously but commuter road traffic hasn't started to build up for the evening peak), taking the average of the four busiest full-hour periods over the day (when there aren't actually many people crossing the road for most of the time) is unlikely to yield a sufficiently high PV² figure to merit the installation of a crossing.
Some authorities are now moving away from solely using a 'raw' PV² model, and weighting their figures to take account of the types of pedestrians involved (e.g. unaccompanied children, elderly people, pedestrian with pushchairs, etc) and other factors, such as the proximity of any proposed crossing to a school. However, with financial constraints pressing down upon them, council officials can still be tempted to use PV² as a justification for turning down a crossing request.
I suggest that, as well as contacting council officials, you should directly contact the council itself. (i.e. don't just write to the council offices. Find out who the local councillors are for that area and ask them each to support your campaign).
1 to 9 of 9
