ChatterBank19 mins ago
Prophet Muhammad & Slaves
28 Answers
With the current craze for the historical discrediting of many people of the past, many of whom had only a rather tenuous connection to slavery, why is the name of Muhammad never mentioned, his connection to slavery was far from tenuous, personally owning them in large numbers.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Mozz, try the estimable, Hamad Abdel- Samad, someone who knows Islam inside out;
https:/ /www.me mri.org /tv/ham ed-abde l-samad -on-sla very-in -islam
https:/
we mustn't criticise British slavers because other countries had them too? Righto!
Needless to say, the Bible has no problems with slavery.
"Slaves, obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling"
“When a man sells his daughter as a slave..."
Thank heaven for Britian's Judaeo-Christian traditions.
Needless to say, the Bible has no problems with slavery.
"Slaves, obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling"
“When a man sells his daughter as a slave..."
Thank heaven for Britian's Judaeo-Christian traditions.
yeah 'famously' a slave was a 'companion' ( original convert)
slavery was er common in the Roman Empire ( no connection) but it is going back rather far.
does account for the slowness to condemn slavery in the East. Sultan Qaboos now dead was notoritous for importing boy slaves from the Sudan.
The Ethiopian that Philip converts in Acts 8 was clearly a slave and there was no free-the-slaves movement really until the 1899s
( o god TUS will start yarting I know I shdnt have let on : bring out your blank canvasses o usual suspects and foo! )
slavery was er common in the Roman Empire ( no connection) but it is going back rather far.
does account for the slowness to condemn slavery in the East. Sultan Qaboos now dead was notoritous for importing boy slaves from the Sudan.
The Ethiopian that Philip converts in Acts 8 was clearly a slave and there was no free-the-slaves movement really until the 1899s
( o god TUS will start yarting I know I shdnt have let on : bring out your blank canvasses o usual suspects and foo! )
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.