Question Author
Corby - // God knows why he lasted so long on Radio One. //
From long experience of listening to and watching the BBC, they do seem to latch on to certain individuals, and imagine them to have not only vast but also seriously long-lasting appeal to their viewers and listeners.
The danger of this, is that the individual can start to believe their own hype, and develop a sense of invincibility, which only ever makes them icreasingly insuferable.
The zenith of that attitude from the BBC towards its own 'legeng' was Terry Wogan, who ended up using such bizarre speech patterns that the could only have come from someone whose first language was not of this planet.
He was constantly whispering one moment and then booming the next, obviously convinced that his admittedly attractive radio voice needed some sort of perculiar enhancement which he conceived and then developed well past the point of charicature.
The only parallel that springs to mind is Jimmy Young, who did exactly the same thing, at the end sounding like something from another planet.
They did try the same with Patrick Kielty, shoe-horning into every single thing they could get him on - TV and radio - but the public simply refused to like him, and eventually the message permeated through.
As I have mentioned before, Len Goodman suffered a similar fate, where the BBC assumed from his Strictly personna, that he was gifted with wit and personality that was imply never there, and his new avenues of quizes and radio shows were swiftly closed off.
It's the way the BBC thinks and operates, from the top to the bottom they have an utterly undserved sense of self-importance and congratulation, as though they money they receive is earned by their own skills and efforts, instead of simply being handed to them year in year out, no matter how much of a hash they make by spending it on rubbish 'talent'.