ChatterBank4 mins ago
What Would You Do With This Guy If The Decision Was Yours To Make?
59 Answers
Keep him in the glass box until he dies or ???
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-1 0344857 /Serial -killer -Robert -Maudsl ey-die- undergr ound-gl ass-box -losing -appeal -freedo m.html
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ladybirder. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Gness - It's not 'my' system - it's the system operated by successive governments of the country I live in. I have no say in its operations, and nothing approaching ownership, so by no stretch of the imagination is it 'mine'.
I do of course have opinions on the ways it operates, on this occasion I think it is being inhumane.
I do of course have opinions on the ways it operates, on this occasion I think it is being inhumane.
Andy, in response to your previous post, I'm not sure anybody has stated that he should be released. It seems probable that he's been psychologically tested and deemed unfit to rejoin humanity. What we do all agree on is that to deny him any form of comfort, such as newspapers, books or a radio is utterly disgusting.
As the very first person posted there may and and possibly is more to this than reported. It would be odd in fact were that not the case.
I doubt if this person was kiliing people out of a sense of public duty, however warped. People often use excuses for their bloodlust, and he didn't only kill sex offenders by the sound of it. So the authorities are lumbered with someone who is apparently a danger to other inmates, quite possibly all other inmates.
The reason for the particularly harsh treatment is not known. It may be justified, it may not.
I doubt if this person was kiliing people out of a sense of public duty, however warped. People often use excuses for their bloodlust, and he didn't only kill sex offenders by the sound of it. So the authorities are lumbered with someone who is apparently a danger to other inmates, quite possibly all other inmates.
The reason for the particularly harsh treatment is not known. It may be justified, it may not.
If he was considered mentally unstable then he should be in Broadmoor. Perhaps kept in a straightjacket if he was considered too dangerous. If not then we must assume he knew what he was doing was wrong and should therefore suffer the consequences. Don't most people disagree with prisoners getting 'privileges'? If you break the law then you should suffer the consequences. Maybe if prisons were less like hotels then less people would offend. But to answer the OP I would have him put down if as I assume there was no question of him having killed those people.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.