It was blindingly obvious from Day One that the spread of this virus (or any other) among humans cannot be prevented. The only way to do so would be to confined everybody to their homes 24/7, by force if necessary. Even that is not 100% secure as those who "break out" will interact with those trying to keep them in. As well as that, unless they are all to die from starvation those being confined will have to be fed and watered by somebody who is not. In short, it's impossible. The spread can be slowed down by reducing the opportunities for mixing but all that does is prolongs the outbreak.
I'm not sure why theres any suprise here. Its pretty obvious that when an infected person meets others in a enclosed place like this it will spread- its not as if they can sit out in the garden or open all the windows
Yes, bobbinwales, but surely even you can see that the bug can't be stopped by running away from each other with hands dripping with gel whilst wearing a mask, visor and amulet of antivirality if it can get to as remote a place as that in the article.
Shutdown/lockdown has been proven to be only useful in selling newspapers and keeping Answerbank ticking over, in the long run.
The merry-go-round just spins where it stands, going nowhere fast, repeat after repeat.
Thanks 7up. Very interesting. I must read all the other articles time permitting.
I've noticed lately that 'modelled data' is 'now' being used by the Gov. agencies that compile Covid info.
People seem bored/accuse others of having an agenda if they question the information given out by the 'authorities'.
One would think everyone would want/demand straightforward unspun information. Seems not.