Good morning reader
take your mind off drownded cats and other important things
and think of fripperies typical of AB
to wit the appeal of Roe vs Wade in the supreme court of the US
It has been leaked for the first time in 200y
which has got all the clerks running around helter skelter with wigs askew
The Supreme Court post is for life, but the posts of the people that use the Supreme Court judgment to make abortion illegal in their states are not lifetime. Those people can be voted out and replaced with people who will reverse those laws.
It's on all the news outlets. Here's an explanation of what it means. Definitely another step back in the US...both for women's rights and democracy...which is disappearing quickly there.
I don't see putting the genie back in the bottle going that well. Not all Republicans are weighed down by religious dogma ... some even have abortions.
Prosperous people will travel from states which don't allow it to states that do. The poor will resort to back street abortions and the risks they present.
The President should load the Supreme Court with a majority of younger liberal judges and strangle this proposal at birth.
ymb - // //The President should load the Supreme Court with a majority of younger liberal judges and strangle this proposal at birth.//
Ah, modern democracy in action! //
On a level with the 'modern democracy' that allows a bunch of complete strangers (men in the majority of course) to tell any woman whose circumstances they know nothing of, and care less, how she is to proceed with her own body, and make decisions for her that affect the rest of her life.
The Supreme Court post is for life, but the posts of the people that use the Supreme Court judgment to make abortion illegal in their states are not lifetime. Those people can be voted out and replaced with people who will reverse those laws.
Supreme Court here is 75 ( age)
and yes their Lordships insist that the days that they can still do good are not over at 75
Drownded is from Albert and the Lion ( you really knew this innit) - no body drownded nothing to laught at , at all
we - in dear old blighty- dont have this idea that the law is immutable - the Constitution as is should never be changed ( 1789 for chrissakes)
whereas other see it is as changing with the times
House of Lords 1973 said it could over rule itself but I havent seen anything as spectac as this !
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.