//Isn't Lawrence Fox a privilege white man?//
I don’t know whether he is privileged. It depends on your interpretation. The man with no shoes is privileged when compared to the man with no feet. That said, there is nothing intrinsically wrong with being privileged. But he is a white man. The issue he took, if I recall (I did see QT, but it’s a while back), was that it was suggested that his viewpoint was not valid or worthy of consideration because he had these attributes. His response (and mine if I had been in his position) was that he was born with those attributes in the same was as the audience member was born with hers. His point was that they are inalienable, not under his control for him to negotiate or change, and to suggest his could not hold an opinion on a particular topic because of them was outrageous. It was effectively closing him down because he is white, male and privileged. Had it been the other way round and he accused the audience member of not having a valid opinion because she was female, black an underprivileged (if indeed she was), there would have been absolute outrage. I’m not surprised he took umbrage.