News1 min ago
Double Whammy
Not only have they lost their Queen, but, as a result of her death, some of these people will also lose their livelihoods.
https:/ /www.ms n.com/e n-gb/ne ws/ukne ws/king -charle s-iii-s -staff- livid-a nd-shak en-as-t hey-re- told-of -palace -redund ancies/ ar-AA11 OpRB?oc id=msed gntp&am p;cvid= eedd888 477ec49 1faf53a 4e79892 0917
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ken4155. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Apparently this just follows protocol, though it may sound harsh. Contracts specifically state that the posts come with a condition that, with a change in the status of the then Prince Charles, the working contracts end. Every employee is aware of this and have been consulted over time. Some are to choose to retire, some will take voluntary redundancy and others will be moved to other roles with the Royal estate. My only thought is that this would have been better been made public after the Queen's funeral though I suspect it may be the case that an employee has spoken to the media.
May be a bit premature, Charles has apparently not yet decided whether keep Clarence House as his home. Like the Queen who lived at Windsor and used Buckingham Palace as her place of work.
Probably wouldn't be very pleasant living there with all the renovation work going on after which he reportedly wants to open it more to the public.
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-1 1205671 /King-C harles- Queen-C onsort- Camilla -said-n o-rush- Bucking ham-Pal ace.htm l
Probably wouldn't be very pleasant living there with all the renovation work going on after which he reportedly wants to open it more to the public.
https:/
//That's why I don't like the monarchy - the plebs can lump it.//
But they don't have to lump it do they. They don't have to take on a job with that explicit condition. They could go and flip burgers at McDonalds or they could train to be a brain surgeon. I guess a job in the Royal Household suits most of them, even with such harsh conditions of employment..
But they don't have to lump it do they. They don't have to take on a job with that explicit condition. They could go and flip burgers at McDonalds or they could train to be a brain surgeon. I guess a job in the Royal Household suits most of them, even with such harsh conditions of employment..
quite so, TTT, she was a trollop and got what she deserved.
This mass sacking was discussed somewhere last night but I can't find it at the moment. What I wondered then was why the redundancies were needed. In effect (putting it very broadly) Charles would take over his mother's staff and William would take over Charles's, and there shouldn't be any need to lose anyone. Is someone genuinely trying to reduce staffing levels?
Charles is still going to need someone to squeeze his toothpaste and iron his shoelaces. But handing out pink slips before the funeral's even been held isn't going to do much for any appearance of being a caring, sharing monarch that he might like to present
This mass sacking was discussed somewhere last night but I can't find it at the moment. What I wondered then was why the redundancies were needed. In effect (putting it very broadly) Charles would take over his mother's staff and William would take over Charles's, and there shouldn't be any need to lose anyone. Is someone genuinely trying to reduce staffing levels?
Charles is still going to need someone to squeeze his toothpaste and iron his shoelaces. But handing out pink slips before the funeral's even been held isn't going to do much for any appearance of being a caring, sharing monarch that he might like to present