Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Happy New Year From The Orcs
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/w orld-eu rope-64 135079
At least one impact in the embassy area not previously targeted.
But Ukrainian air attacks also on Crimea.
Looks like one Russian missile impacted in the Volgograd region. Rather spectacularly
At least one impact in the embassy area not previously targeted.
But Ukrainian air attacks also on Crimea.
Looks like one Russian missile impacted in the Volgograd region. Rather spectacularly
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ichkeria. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It does look like these attacks are aimed largely at civilians,
One woman was killed when a hotel was hit in the Pechersk area of Kyiv, and the Palace "Ukraina" had its windows blown out: this is a large arts centre near the Olympic stadium, which normally would be full of kids of New Years Eve.
Luckily on this occasion it wasn't
One woman was killed when a hotel was hit in the Pechersk area of Kyiv, and the Palace "Ukraina" had its windows blown out: this is a large arts centre near the Olympic stadium, which normally would be full of kids of New Years Eve.
Luckily on this occasion it wasn't
I'm trying to get my head around NATO's attitude on this.
Last September, Ukraine applied for membership.
The US currently provides more military and humanitarian aid than everyone else put together.
Yet Biden and NATO say "not right now" to Ukraine's application since they fear nuclear escalation.
I'm beginning to wonder about the efficacy of NATO at all, and if this is just a classic historical ploy of war by proxy between east and west.
On the other hand... as long as we keep up the aid, Russia must surely run out of missiles eventually. Should we just run with that?
Last September, Ukraine applied for membership.
The US currently provides more military and humanitarian aid than everyone else put together.
Yet Biden and NATO say "not right now" to Ukraine's application since they fear nuclear escalation.
I'm beginning to wonder about the efficacy of NATO at all, and if this is just a classic historical ploy of war by proxy between east and west.
On the other hand... as long as we keep up the aid, Russia must surely run out of missiles eventually. Should we just run with that?
From allies? Yes: longer range missiles, tanks and drones from the US coming. The Leopard tanks from Germany would really help but no sign as yet.
According to the foreign minister.
Rumour also has it though that Ukraine is developing its own long range missiles and drones.
And the Patriot air defence system should help defend the slies against any ballistic missiles the russians might get from eg Iran to replace their dwindling stocks. The current air defences aren't good at taking out ballistic as opposed to cruise missiles and rockets.
But increasingly Ukraine is getting more successful at taking out the enemy drones.
All these attacks are launched against civilian not military targets and while that does impact on the military to an extent, fundamentally it's a waste of resources by the russians.
According to the foreign minister.
Rumour also has it though that Ukraine is developing its own long range missiles and drones.
And the Patriot air defence system should help defend the slies against any ballistic missiles the russians might get from eg Iran to replace their dwindling stocks. The current air defences aren't good at taking out ballistic as opposed to cruise missiles and rockets.
But increasingly Ukraine is getting more successful at taking out the enemy drones.
All these attacks are launched against civilian not military targets and while that does impact on the military to an extent, fundamentally it's a waste of resources by the russians.
Nato?
Stoltenberg could hardly be clearer: Nato is in this for the long haul. Having said that, it really should not take all that long. Delivery of the right weapons systems, in combination with Ukraine's superior training, moirale, tactics and motivation, should delivery victory sooner rather later - in theory. It is not just Nato, or the US or the EU or the UK. There is an alliance of 40 plus other nations who collaborate to provide assistance.
Stoltenberg could hardly be clearer: Nato is in this for the long haul. Having said that, it really should not take all that long. Delivery of the right weapons systems, in combination with Ukraine's superior training, moirale, tactics and motivation, should delivery victory sooner rather later - in theory. It is not just Nato, or the US or the EU or the UK. There is an alliance of 40 plus other nations who collaborate to provide assistance.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.