ChatterBank1 min ago
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.sandyRoe
I think it's too late now, judging by this story from last month (that's how I read it anyway):
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ us-news /2023/f eb/15/t rump-e- jean-ca rroll-d efamati on-laws uit-dna
I think it's too late now, judging by this story from last month (that's how I read it anyway):
https:/
There seems to be a lot of ‘maybe’ and ‘if’ in all of this.
yup. no poo Sherlock
concerns Law of evidence AND admissibility.
certain evidence can be forced - but then remains specific to the case. Private Eye did this 40 y ago. - got evidence in case 1 that was not usable in case 2.
Harriet Harman felt the edge of a judges ruler
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ politic s/2004/ mar/24/ houseof commons .harrie tharman 1
when she was solicitor general
Judgie baby stressing that someone as august as that really SHOULD know when info can be passed on and when not - - child protection case.
Harman limply insisted her dept said she cd
yup. no poo Sherlock
concerns Law of evidence AND admissibility.
certain evidence can be forced - but then remains specific to the case. Private Eye did this 40 y ago. - got evidence in case 1 that was not usable in case 2.
Harriet Harman felt the edge of a judges ruler
https:/
when she was solicitor general
Judgie baby stressing that someone as august as that really SHOULD know when info can be passed on and when not - - child protection case.
Harman limply insisted her dept said she cd
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.