didnt one of the great pontificators of AB write: ( on thee golliwog thread)
Owning golliwogs is not illegal so it can only be because they caused offence.
and so here,
as we note the vehicle has been seized
Owning a motorhome is not illegal so it can only be because it caused offence.
on AB you can rely on someone writing complete rot. Here by the way, the article cd have been connected with the commission of an offence ( according to Chris' article) and may have been (re)moved
Note reader TTT goes all poncey over the removal of golliwogs and yet doesnt bat an eyelid over the removal of a motorhome ( one, owned lawfully)
only on AB