How it Works13 mins ago
Listener 4775 Citation Needed By Cagey
10 Answers
I rarely post, and have never started a thread, but I wanted to congratulate and thank Cagey for an all-time classic Listener. Surely in the very top tier (top 5, at least) in my 20+ years of solving. The endgame is stunning, and (meant in the best possible way) it must take a seriously deranged mind to construct such a thing. Thanks again, Cagey, for reminding me why I love the Listener so much.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by scooterbug. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Too tired after working at this most of the afternoon/evening to fully appreciate what I just worked through, but that was certainly something.
I think at the moment my favourite touch is that the grid-fill seemed impossible without an additional piece of information from the extra letters (ie, the message has to make sense, resolving one last ambiguity).
I mean, that's tight setting. Squeezing everything out of the puzzle.
I think at the moment my favourite touch is that the grid-fill seemed impossible without an additional piece of information from the extra letters (ie, the message has to make sense, resolving one last ambiguity).
I mean, that's tight setting. Squeezing everything out of the puzzle.
Like Nickorwan, I too had to restart after an inadvertent slip led me to a dead end. One of those where you have to check, check and check again before committing to the codings. Fantastic puzzle, and an endgame with no "guess what I'm thinking", just astonishment at how it was put together. Brilliant work Cagey.
I fully expected to look up Cagey in the setters list and find it was Twin! No so, it seems.
A very clever puzzle indeed, but one with so much slog involved, I can't say I enjoyed it as much as I should have. Reducing everything to a 4-symbol code meant I was making errors all over the place. I eventually switched to full numerical-solving mode (and I'll argue with anyone that this is more of a numerical than a letter puzzle) and used a spreadsheet to do all the decoding and checking - and it made the endgame stages very quick, too.
I'll appreciate it more, I'm sure, when my brain's had a rest. Many thanks, Cagey.
A very clever puzzle indeed, but one with so much slog involved, I can't say I enjoyed it as much as I should have. Reducing everything to a 4-symbol code meant I was making errors all over the place. I eventually switched to full numerical-solving mode (and I'll argue with anyone that this is more of a numerical than a letter puzzle) and used a spreadsheet to do all the decoding and checking - and it made the endgame stages very quick, too.
I'll appreciate it more, I'm sure, when my brain's had a rest. Many thanks, Cagey.
I slept on it, and I feel a lot warmer about Cagey's achievement here.
I can see how to construct it, or how to start constructing it at least (starting with the endgame), but I just wouldn't have attempted to. I don't think there's any guarantee that there's a solvable unique-solution puzzle at the end of it, so the setter would need a lot of vision/visualisation, not to mention hope at each stage. I'm particularly looking forward to the LWO setter's blog for this one.
I can see how to construct it, or how to start constructing it at least (starting with the endgame), but I just wouldn't have attempted to. I don't think there's any guarantee that there's a solvable unique-solution puzzle at the end of it, so the setter would need a lot of vision/visualisation, not to mention hope at each stage. I'm particularly looking forward to the LWO setter's blog for this one.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.