ChatterBank7 mins ago
Life After Death Impossible?
26 Answers
just a thought, over the centuries and now, people have reported thye have seen spirits ghosts etc.. are they all lying or hallucinating, even some renowned people have said they have seen a ghost ghosts etc, i tend to believe they exist or something strange is going on.
https:/
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by fender62. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Although most occurrences can be explained, experience has taught me that odd things that really do defy ‘rational’ explanation happen. I set little store by the claims of ghost hunters who make a hobby of visiting places that make a business of their resident ‘ghosts’. Although they say they look for the rational first I think they grasp at almost any straw and call it supernatural simply because they want to find it.
I don’t believe anything is supernatural. Once we discover what’s happening - if we ever do - all will be regarded as just another element of nature.
I don’t believe anything is supernatural. Once we discover what’s happening - if we ever do - all will be regarded as just another element of nature.
I don’t believe in any of this stuff because it’s just too fantastically absurd, plus there’s never been a single jot of evidence of its existence. All we’ve ever had is anecdotal.
There’s been a number of debates on AB over the years about ghosts with people swearing blind they’ve experienced them, and the conversation has been something similar to the following:
“Ghosts do not exist – if they did we’d have evidence by now, for a start pretty much everybody has a camera on their phone.”
“Well I’ve seen a ghost – are you calling me a liar?”
“I’m not calling you a liar, but you saying you’ve seen a ghost is anecdotal at best, and you saying you’ve seen one doesn’t mean that me, as a non-believer, will suddenly start believing in them just on your say so”
Other things I don’t believe in are:
God.
Santa.
Leprachauns.
The fairies at the bottom of the garden.
The efficacy of homeopathy.
There’s been a number of debates on AB over the years about ghosts with people swearing blind they’ve experienced them, and the conversation has been something similar to the following:
“Ghosts do not exist – if they did we’d have evidence by now, for a start pretty much everybody has a camera on their phone.”
“Well I’ve seen a ghost – are you calling me a liar?”
“I’m not calling you a liar, but you saying you’ve seen a ghost is anecdotal at best, and you saying you’ve seen one doesn’t mean that me, as a non-believer, will suddenly start believing in them just on your say so”
Other things I don’t believe in are:
God.
Santa.
Leprachauns.
The fairies at the bottom of the garden.
The efficacy of homeopathy.
I would add that I don’t believe the ‘supernatural’ has anything to do with religion which is simply a figment of man’s imagination.
In saying ‘the laws of physics underlying everyday life are completely understood’, I think Sean Carroll may be mistaken. For example what happens to the energy generated by emotions - where does it go? And what does a thought consist of? What is its fibre? Does a lifetime of all of that somehow combine to form what we call the soul? We know the mechanics of how thoughts and emotions are generated but that’s about it. I don’t believe we know all there to know about physics as the expert intimates - not by a long way - and I really think he might be jumping the gun and giving science credit where it really isn’t due.
In saying ‘the laws of physics underlying everyday life are completely understood’, I think Sean Carroll may be mistaken. For example what happens to the energy generated by emotions - where does it go? And what does a thought consist of? What is its fibre? Does a lifetime of all of that somehow combine to form what we call the soul? We know the mechanics of how thoughts and emotions are generated but that’s about it. I don’t believe we know all there to know about physics as the expert intimates - not by a long way - and I really think he might be jumping the gun and giving science credit where it really isn’t due.
