So It Was Just Another Dirty Con Trick...
News2 mins ago
https:/
Historically higher rates of tax has raised very little. It is beloved of the left to use to stifle enterprise and effort and punish those that seek to improve themselves and the country. This example exposes the issue nicely.
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.09.40 "Re The Brain Drain we suffered".......So that's why TTT never emigrated...
unworthy of you Gullz. The other little foible of yours, I wish to rebuke strongly - is referring to the society of intellects that TTT is a member of - by the wrong name - such as Wa+nka
and then putting a hand over your mouth in faux horror and saying - "oo have I made a boo-boo? I meant Mensa"
juvenile in the extreme
Anyway... it is all to do wih tax bases. This is the set of people who will pay the tax. Penny on income tax - 30 m people afffected - huge tax base, huge tax haul
the tax base for super tax is small and the take is small
BUT - taxing them until the pips squeak ( Healey) 1965 is a thing of the past.
the same as for IHT - but there are reasons to tax or untax which is not financial
er as I was saying....
this is about tax bases - the number of people paying a higher rate of tax is small so the tax take is small
30m people pay basic income tax in UK and so a penny on the income tax as it has a broad tax base, brings in lots to the treasury
no wonder ABers remain so ignorant - all my best tax theortical gems get deleted !
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.