Donate SIGN UP

Dacorum Borough Council Committing Fraud – Do You Think The Police Will Investigate?

Avatar Image
Hymie | 12:10 Fri 15th Mar 2024 | Law
8 Answers

....according to Nick Freeman (aka Mr Loophole)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-68566623

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 8 of 8rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Hymie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

I don't see how urine is litter, assuming that is the only reason for fining them.

A lot of drivers urinate discreetly in to a container whilst sat in their vehicle and empty it in to a drain.  I don't see the difference 

if Mr Freemen believes that urination is not classified as litter under the Environmental Protection Act 1990, he should encourage one of his clients to test his belief in court. if he wins then he can encourage others to challenge their fines. if not, he can wind his neck in.

If you can't pick it up it ain't litter, end of.

Question Author

Dacorum Borough Council have got themselves a tidy sum by this action, should they refund the money before the old bill calls around?

Of course tge police won't.. why should they. Ots not been tested by the courts. If it was they would be expected to give refunds. It's not fraud.

Sorry, typing is hard on my phone while taking a wild wee

Question Author

Here’s Mr Loophole discussing this further:-

 

There is no fraud involved.

Enforcement Agencies (EAs) are free to offer fixed penalties when they believe offences have been committed. Those receiving those offers are equally free to ignore them after which the EA's only option is to prosecute the matter through the Magistrates' Court. There, the usual criminal procedure rules and rules of evidence will govern the proceedings and the EA will have to comply with them.

As far as the actual issue goes (i.e. is urine "litter"?) I don't fancy their chances. Nowhere in the Environmental Protection Act is urine mentioned. DEFRA's guidance on littering also does not mention it. I have never heard of anybody taken to court under the EPA for urinating being convicted. I think Tora's definition is actually a very good one for determining what litter is.

1 to 8 of 8rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Dacorum Borough Council Committing Fraud – Do You Think The Police Will Investigate?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.