How it Works0 min ago
Favouritism?
He only offered us 10,000 🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Another idiotic gesture. One nation decides it doesn't want hunting trophies imported into it, and a different nation chooses to take offence muttering nonsense about it having anything at all to their option to cull or not, and coming up with such a suggestion as if it made any point whatsoever.
How do these folk get into positions of power ?
Well it is do do with our import restrictions.
What they are saying is that if no trophy hunters pay good money to hunt elephants that need to be culled then it will hit their local economies. Firstly they would have to pay to cull them (they have no money) and secondly they will have to pay to carve up the carcass for food, thirdy the 'trophys' will just be binned anyway.
the thing is, African nations face pressure (from elephant-free countries) to ban ivory in order to save the elephant population. Botswana is saying it's already got more than it can handle. I don't know how that balances out against the conservation argument, but maybe someone should be doing the sums.