Quizzes & Puzzles20 mins ago
If Their Claims Were True.
What would be the relationship between the natural son of King Charles and the unacknowledged son of Princess Margaret?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yes. AIP - this is VERY technical for AB and we will get the 'helpers' down our necks
The thingo was.... the skin rash wasnt THAT obvious. So... they dug up one of Victoria's cousins that died in a mad-house and found.... AIP ( new but not private) mutation.
THEN someone came forward and said - oh plane crasher had it as well, but no one said.
and so yes - the er look-back involved George III - the madness of King George ( very accurately) retells the Regency crisis of 1788. Alan Bennet eaves ( yes weaves darling) a thread of 20 century sentiment thro the script. Everyone who witnesses the kings madness gets fired
and of course 1787 isnt 1783. And the King did not have conduct of that war.
er better end before the Erinyes arrive
ooh and James VI and I - BUT in those days almost everyone had haematuria ( this is not gonna last) so discoloured urine was not a good sign 1500-1600
ooh and it doesnt die out ( porphyria ) but persists and this is called the founder effect.
"A founder effect is when a small isolated population of settlers (founders) expands over several generations leading to a high prevalence of a genetic trait. Most individuals with Variegate Porphyria in South Africa carry the same PPOX mutation and are descendents of a Dutch settler from the late 1600s."
I think is wrong: that is the bottle neck effect - and the profusion of cases is because under these circs, Darwin does not apply