Donate SIGN UP

I've Not Seen Bridgerton But Understand It Features A Lot Of Regency...

Avatar Image
sandyRoe | 23:04 Sun 30th Jun 2024 | ChatterBank
11 Answers

...rumpy pumpy.

If so, is it really a suitable vehicle for the Duchess of York?  Hadn't her former husband done enough damage to the Royal Family without her adding her tuppence worth?

 

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 11 of 11rss feed

Avatar Image
quite a nice fit, I would have thought. She would have made a good Regency trollop, fun-seeking and not excessively bright. Come to that, I thought she made a good match with Andrew.
23:59 Sun 30th Jun 2024

She is a not a stranger to a bit of offside rumpy pumpy herself. Perfect for the role.

Much as her association with feet turned my stomach, I like the game gal.

I've no idea what you're talking about, sandyRoe.

Question Author

In yesterday's Telegraph:

"The Duchess of York has asked her agent to get her a part in Bridgerton, the TV drama, she has revealed."

quite a nice fit, I would have thought. She would have made a good Regency trollop, fun-seeking and not excessively bright. Come to that, I thought she made a good match with Andrew.

😂😂😂

I really expected her to marry Andrew after Philip died

She still might

I'll add it to my list of reasons not to watch Bridgerton 

// quite a nice fit, I would have thought. //

does toe-sucking feature in Bridgerton, JNO?

Question Author

My first thought was she might play Queen Charlotte, locked out of the Abbey during her husband's coronation, but Google tells me that role is already taken.

I wouldn't be surprised, mushroom.

1 to 11 of 11rss feed

Do you know the answer?

I've Not Seen Bridgerton But Understand It Features A Lot Of Regency...

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.