Thank You Starmer Reeves And Raynor
ChatterBank2 mins ago
https:/
Surely that's grounds for summary dismissal? madness.
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//ymb obviously believes the Far Right should be allowed to ravage the country trying to destroy democracy and are unfairly stopped from doing so by the police.//
No he doesnt and if you had bothered to read my many posts over the many years you would know this is exactly the sort of Policing I approve of. The issue is applying it across the board, ie dont have 2-tiers.
I think we have forgotten our Lady Bird Book of English Law
Criminal has to beyond reasonable doubt - and was a non starter in this case.
civil is on the balance of probs
He has never been charged with any criminal offences and says he has never presented any safeguarding risk to anyone.
safeguarding is now an industry in itself - sozza safeguarding regulation is now a profit able industry
and if the Barring service wont do anything then there is virtually no evidence. it is on balance of probs. If you are 'barred' you cant even get a job in a cafe ( cleaning table involved kids)
Surely that's grounds for summary dismissal? yes if anything were proven which it clearly wasnt.
If the canon didnt go, the arch b of C yup him, Rowan Atkinson, was considering dissolving the diocese ! Blimey and so no one wd be canon.
Surely that's grounds for summary dismissal? Ay hev been subject to unproven complaints - and if your accuser really plays his cards right, you end up being asked to prove you didnt do something you er didnt do. ( can be very difficult). ( incredz wh I managed to do)
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.