Mass Job Losses In The Retail Sector Expected....costs Up £7Bn..

[ToraToraTora]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp816jrnynyo

....yes it's real labour alright.

£2.33bn ENI, simlar for both minimum wage increases and new "environmental" levies on packagin etc.

Is Labour trying to kill off what is left of the high st?

[New Judge]

“Theres no stats at all in the OP, just hearsay.”

I wouldn’t normally mention it but you have the wrong understanding of “hearsay”. And you’ve used the term in a number of threads. 

Hearsay is “second hand” information which you might hear from somebody else. For example, if you say “Alan told me he saw Bill punch Charlie” you cannot say with certainty that Bill punched Charlie. All you can say is that you heard Alan say he did (hence the term).

The link provided in the OP includes no hearsay. It is information from employers who know exactly how much the new measures will cost them. They know how many people they employ; they know how much they pay each of them; they know how much that means currently in terms of NI and they can calculate accurately how much more they will pay under the new charges. They are saying what they will have to do to cope with those extra costs. That is not hearsay.

I’m sure you’ll agree that businesses cannot simply wait to see what happens. They have to make those calculations. Is foolish to dismiss them as “hearsay”.
 

[nicebloke1]

Someone must have told TTT  about these losses, so hearsay. I doubt TTT would make this up would he??? 

[newmodarmy]

I'd give up if I were you newjudge.

[nicebloke1]

The alarm has gone off.

[nicebloke1]

He could however heard massive over the top estimates. :0)

[New Judge]

"Someone must have told TTT  about these losses, so hearsay. I doubt TTT would make this up would he???" 

The link that TTT provided forms part of his post. That link contains first hand comments from retailers. It was those comments his question related to. He didn't add any unsubstantiated information himself.

If you quote something from a reliable source and comment on it that may be opinion, but not hearsay. You have stated in a few threads that reports of what various groups have said the effect that the budget will have on their businesses is hearsay. It isn't. 

Of course you could argue that everything you read is merely hearsay because you were not present when it happened. If that's the case I think you should consider your position when contributing to a written forum.

I said previously that I'm unsure whether you are uninformed or simply being obtuse. or cantankerous. The jury's still out on that one.

[ToraToraTora]

judge: "I said previously that I'm unsure whether you are uninformed or simply being obtuse. or cantankerous. The jury's still out on that one." - try moronic trolling idiot.

[New Judge]

"...try moronic trolling idiot."

I'm far too polite to say that, Tora!  🤣 

[nicebloke1]

No NJ PLEASE join your insulting mate TTT. How about the comments from retailers being exaggerated passed on by our very own doom and gloom mongers, the main ones being yourself and TTT.

[nicebloke1]

Oh I nearly forgot, bless me. TTTs OP ( Kill off what is left of the high street) it was killed off during the last 14 of the cons.

[Pegasus16]

Blimey, what a horrific mess this shambolic UKGov is creating. It's just one disaster after another, totally out of their depth.

[nicebloke1]

Your dead right their in a mess, one big mess the cons left behind.

[vulcan42]

nicebloke, the point you miss is during those years you refer to, Starmer repeatedly told us he could do better. The last few months have proved he can do a lot worse.