Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by smurfchops. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

What's the problem? 

Did I hear the other day that one of the doctors who gave evidence has now changed his mind .

I hope this does not turnout to be another miscarriage of justice 

Should they both be in isolation ?

Bazile, it's been discussed in the news quite a bit over the past several months. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgwx9xprwqo

As they are both in prison, on the same wing, I can't see any problem with them associating with each other.

I wouldn't be surprised if Letby appeals successfuly at some stage in the future.  I heard a respected statistician explaining the flawed nature of some key statistics, and that whilst Letyby was present when X % of incidents occurrred, so were lots of other people.

Ok, it's off topic as this is more about Sharif, but I don't know what rues you could put in place about who can become friends with whom. The prisons are full of criminals. End of, as someone says

Did I hear the other day that one of the doctors who gave evidence has now changed his mind .

yes you did ( and I shuddered - GMC time for him etc)

and he has denied he has recanted ( yes I know implied double negative) and said he never said that

Dr Dewi Davies

The defence doctor declined to give evidence as it was said on the street - he cd not support his clients story

 

Many people, including of all things The New Yorker, have cast doubt on her conviction. Even mathematicians have challenged the 'compelling' evidence.

I personally feel there are grounds for a re-examination of this case.

I would have said it should be encouraged as it means there is less violence. Prisons being what they are

This didnt happen with Beverley Allitt - BUT - didnt she do shifts where the patients started dying ? ( classical  pattern, Toronto 1976)

I heard a respected statistician explaining the flawed nature of some key statistics,

I heard some statistician and thought he was saying " I want to earn a few bob by being a defence expert" it is not an exact science

and if you have one death a month average ( 12 a year) and then one month there are three - is that significant? You should certainly investigate ( which I dont think they did). *f you have six in a month and do nothiing, you are risking your career. 

and not say - "oh this is a variation which is quite common actually so go back to your coffee"

Oh air embolism

If you x ray a baby who has died suddently and there is air in the veins ( which  you can see, even medical students are trained to spot it) then someone has injected air

so now the issue is - someone is killing the babies the question is who?

One unrelated case

mercury from an old thermometer ended up in a  dead patients axilla ( easily seen on X ray)

Criminals in prison mix with criminals, no doubt these two are on the NONCE wing.

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Letby And Sharif

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.