­
British Government : Censorship in The AnswerBank: ChatterBank
Donate SIGN UP

British Government : Censorship

Avatar Image
tommy39 | 12:48 Tue 15th Apr 2025 | ChatterBank
10 Answers

Access Restricted by Provider

After receiving yet another demand from the UK's speech police, Ofcom, Gab has made the decision to block the entire United Kingdom from accessing our website.

This latest email from Ofcom ordered us to disclose information about our users and operations. We know where this leads: compelled censorship and British citizens thrown in jail for "hate speech." We refuse to comply with this tyranny.

Gab is an American company with zero presence in the UK. Ofcom's demands have no legal force here. To enforce anything in the United States, they'd need to go through a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty request or letters rogatory. No U.S. court is going to enforce a foreign censorship regime. The First Amendment forbids it.

Ofcom will likely try to make an example of us anyway. That's because the UK's Online Safety Act isn't about protecting children. It's about suppressing dissent.

They're welcome to try. The idea that a British regulator can pressure a U.S. company that's IP-blocking the entire UK is as farcical as it is futile. If anything, it proves our point: censorship doesn't work. It only reveals the truth about the censors.

We proudly join platforms like Bitchute in boycotting the United Kingdom. American companies should follow suit. The power of the UK's parliament ends where the First Amendment begins.

The only way to vote against the tyranny of the UK's present regime is to walk away from it, refuse to comply, and take refuge under the impervious shelter of the First Amendment.

The UK's rulers want their people kept in the dark. Let them see how long the public tolerates it as their Internet vanishes, one website at a time.

Gravatar
Rich Text Editor, the_answer

Answers

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by tommy39. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

Gab is no loss to us.

Question Author

it may not be a loss to the u.k.it is an american site, what is worrying is that ofcom think they can ride roughshod over the first amendment, a slippery slope indeed,and why do we put up with it??

"what is worrying is that ofcom think they can ride roughshod over the first amendment," - what is more worrying is that you think we should give a rats April about the micky mouse written constiution of one of our colonies.

Is Gab affiliated to the Ramblers Association?

I hope this gets moved to another section as it's not really suitable for chatterbank 

Ofcom is the government-approved regulatory and competition authority and as such it has to deliver its remit.

Gab as a private entity has choices, and it has chosen to  IP-block the entire UK.

Their choice, no loss ...

"Gab has made the decision to block the entire United Kingdom from accessing our website."

It was Gab's decision to block the access so have a moan at them!

Lambs to the slaughter.

//...the micky mouse written constiution of one of our colonies...//

Someone's mouth is spouting unnecessary drivel again.

foo !

how long did he spend composing that one?

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Do you know the answer?

British Government : Censorship

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.

Complete your gift to make an impact