That is fact. The British Army was well and truly a discusting organisation in Ireland.
As for who shot first. The IRA in the begining had only a handful of guns, with only a handful of ammo. There was a policy in the IRA that no matter what the gun has to get back, even if your dead, the gun had to get back to base. With this in mind, do you really think, that the IRA would bring all of its weapons (because the British claim that over 150 open fired on them) to a GAA match? No, those weapons were needed else where. Second, why would they bring weapons to a GAA match? Its a sport, not a target range. Third, why would IRA members go to a GAA match when there was a war to fight?
The next day a lord (or MP or onr of those government people) had to explain the events to the government. He said that "they were fired upon by a large part of the crowd, and that it was not part of the British Army policy of reprisals". So this means that there was a policy of reprisals in Ireland.
The fact that anyone disputes that that event happened at all makes me sick. Just like the Bloody Sunday that followed this Bloody Sunday, the British Army are all too quick to fire live ammunition into civilian populations, and NEVER take responsabilty for it afterwards.
Th�ochaigh �r l�