ChatterBank1 min ago
Has the Iraqi deputy President got it correct?. Is Blair a brainwashed person
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jse ssionid=SFHGNPILHFBMHQFIQMFSFGGAVCBQ0IV0?xml=/ news/2006/12/20/ublair120.xml
Has the deputy President of Iraq hit the nail on the head. Has he said publicly what most of the British people/establishment/labour party/voters have suspected for a while.
Has the deputy President of Iraq hit the nail on the head. Has he said publicly what most of the British people/establishment/labour party/voters have suspected for a while.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by matt66. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Rightly or wrongly, the US and UK military in Iraq will be acting in lockstep when it comes to withdrawal.
Whether that is evidence of brainwashing or realpolitik is a matter of opinion, I guess. I would doubt that any commitments or assurances on a departure timetable would be given to the Iraqi PM by the UK in the absence of an agreed timetable between the US and the UK in any event.
Whether that is evidence of brainwashing or realpolitik is a matter of opinion, I guess. I would doubt that any commitments or assurances on a departure timetable would be given to the Iraqi PM by the UK in the absence of an agreed timetable between the US and the UK in any event.
I don't think Blair has been brainwashed, I think he is just impotent.
It is clear that the US leads on policy with regard to the military presence in Iraq. And where US leads, UK follows. However, when Tony the World Stateman is on his travels, he can't fob people off by saying he will have to see what his mate George thinks, so invariably he bluffs it out, leading to the Deputy President of Iraq coming away with the wrong impression of Tony's views on withdrawal.
Tony is a master at telling people what they want to hear, then doesn't deliver (nearly everything in the last 10 years for example).
It is clear that the US leads on policy with regard to the military presence in Iraq. And where US leads, UK follows. However, when Tony the World Stateman is on his travels, he can't fob people off by saying he will have to see what his mate George thinks, so invariably he bluffs it out, leading to the Deputy President of Iraq coming away with the wrong impression of Tony's views on withdrawal.
Tony is a master at telling people what they want to hear, then doesn't deliver (nearly everything in the last 10 years for example).
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.