Sorry for the delay in getting back to you on this one. I just read "The Black Angel" myself a few months ago after being passed it by a friend. I enjoyed the unusual plot overall, but I feel John Connolly has two main faults as a novelist, both of which are very evident in "The Black Angel": 1) He doesn't seem to know whether he wants to write "simple" crime thrillers, or much more involved, thought--provoking, semi-philosophical works about the nature of evil - and so as a result I think he often falls badly between the two. 2) I feel increasingly that his violent set-pieces - which read as if they are written simply for their eventual screenplay value - are more and more extreme, distasteful and disturbing, for no obvious need or reason, and for me at least this detracts badly from his other good writing qualities. I found the endless casual slaughter in "The Black Angel" very disturbing at times - and I have a VERY strong stomach..!! I've read three of his novels now, and I thought the earliest was easily the best - which means for me at least that his inventiveness is deteriorating. I'll probably move on to my next top-of-the-list author next time.