Donate SIGN UP

First serious relationship not until late 20s. Odd or not?

Avatar Image
socasa | 11:42 Sat 06th Jan 2007 | Relationships & Dating
4 Answers
Have just watched an episode of Frineds. Phoebe doesn't have a serious relationship (i.e. one lasting more than a couple of months!!) until she's in her late 20s. This question mainly goes out to the boys. If you met a girl and she hadn't had a boyf before would you think it weird? Would it put you off? Not phase you?

Turning it around, if I met a boy who hadn't had a relationship before and wasn't a 'player' then I would wonder why.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by socasa. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
No it wouldn't put me off. Why would it?
Would you prefer someone who'd played the field?
Ok, ignore my last answer. I completely misunderstood the question. Eejit.

No it wouldn't put me off. But I guess it depends on the reasons. If they've spent their time playing around then yes I'd be put off. But if she was just shy then it'd be fine, after all I can relate to that.
At the age of 23 i'm in my first serious relationship with a guy who's 28. This was mainly due to me having a lack of confidence as a teenager like never being able to approach guys, talk to guys etc. My boyfriend is aware of this so it was never an issue. So it depends on the situation really.
Not at all.

Some people are like that, nothing wrong in waiting, in fact Id say its a lot worse being a "player"

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Do you know the answer?

First serious relationship not until late 20s. Odd or not?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.