marriage material...

[sair5412]

A man you are lustfully attracted to but lets you down (a lot of the time) and can be unthoughtful, The overall relationship is turbulant but the chemistry is there....

or...

A steady consistant man who would stick by you through thick & thin, suppport you through good times and bad, be as loyal as a labrador, but the sexual chemistry is missing...

[noxlumos]

Well apparently the former.

[Eve]

Neither.

[ummmm]

Not sure, I think I would go for the latter

[ladyshy]

Marriage material? Is this some sort of job interview where you check the boxes?

Good grief... I honestly hope this question is hyperthetical Sair.

Neither is good as you can't love either of them fully which is not fair on yourself or them.

[sair5412]

It is hyperthetical! lol!

But I do know people who have settled for the latter and say that's what marriage is all about. I couldn't do that. But then I couldn't do how my aunt does which is the former. He's an a**e but she 'loves' him.

I've met men like the above 2 but i'm still waiting to meet a sexy Mr Steady!!

I just wondered what other people would choose from (if they had to.)

[curlylfim]

why do you have to compromise, there must be someone with the best of both worlds, hyperthetically

or hyperthetical of course have the first as a lover and the second as a husband, then you'd have the best of both worlds...