Assuming that the article is an accurate report - it is always difficult to tell, a journalist's wording may imply one thing, when the truth is somewhat different - it seems to me that the key phrase is "Their report also cited incidents of insensitivity towards Muslim pupils - such as serving pork in school meals." That implies to me that there was a choice of other food, but that the complaint was that a "forbidden food" was allowed within the sight of Muslim children. I can't help but think "tough luck". Isn't pork forbidden to Jewish people? I haven't heard of Rabbis complaining that pork is being served in British schools. I think there would be a lot less Islamaphobia if the more radical community leaders stopped trying to push their views on everyone else; I have my doubts as to whether they truly represent the views of the "Muslim in the street". (A bit like the British political leaders...)