Donate SIGN UP

Pierced ears on babies and very small children.

Avatar Image
flip-flop | 14:03 Fri 16th Feb 2007 | Society & Culture
13 Answers
Tantamount to abuse or just another example of the naffness of breeding chavs?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by flip-flop. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
yuck!!I hate it,why the hell do they do it!I remember having my ears pierced when i was 13 and it was like some sort of coming of age thing,i was really excited and i felt really grown up after.But to do it to a baby who has no say in the matter is abuse surely?What do you think?
I think it's vile. Why would you want to cause pain to your baby/child, however momentarily it may be?

In my opinion, all you are doing is feeding your own vanity when you do this.
Question Author
Oh I'm very firmly of the opinion that it is abuse cyanide AND just another example of naff chavness.
What about when it's done in places like India flip-flop?

Is that Chavishness?

Or is it just that you associate the phenomina with a group of people you don't like?

Nice example of a false dichotomy your question by the way

Coming soon: "Neckties - a health hazard or just a sign of self-righteous middle aged men?" :c)
Question Author
Ah yes, those well known chavs from Mumbai.

As the chav phenomenon is a British disease I'd suggest it is quite obvious to what I am referring.
i dont agree with it either, like cyanide, i too had mine done at abut 12 or 13 like most girls in my class?
jake the peg ........i think when its done in other countries its maybe a culture thing? ; )
i really wouldnt know what it represented in this country? cant see it being of any use AT ALL before the age that you change change the earrings yourself? x
I quite like the idea of folks from Mumbai being chavs- I can see those Burberry saris now!
jake the peg,
what a strange comparison,
india has a totally different culture to britain.
why not stick to the question that was raised.
i dont know wether you would call it chavness or not,
it certainly shows a lack of thought for the
child,
Why put your baby through it. Is there an urgent medical reason to have it done. I think not. It is cruel not to mention chavtastic.
Regardless of the social issues, the fact is that it can be dangerous, and personally I think that any piercing of the body should not be done until the child is old enough to at least be asked, Some cultures drag a screaming female child and hold her down to circumcise her and make her have a lifetime of difficulties, but that does not mean it is ok.
Surely to damage someones body without their consent is assault?
I agree with Jake the Peg. It is not my cup of tea at all, but this is no reason to demean a portion of society who wish to do it to their children.

People moan about the big brother nation/nanny state we are becoming and here above we have a (possibly) cross-section of society denigrating another section because of their fashion sense or the social milieu they find themselves in.
I was 21 when I got my ears pierced and it hurt so much I fainted (I'm no wuss, I gave birth without a fuss). My daughter is 5 and has asked a few times to have it done. Mainly as a result of seeing classmates with pretties in. I've TOLD her father (who wants to give in to her) that as soon as she's able to hold an arguement and make her point she can have them done. I reckon that's bought me at least 8 years!

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Pierced ears on babies and very small children.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.