Donate SIGN UP

Mohammed Al Fayed

Avatar Image
Ric.ror | 13:14 Mon 05th Mar 2007 | Current Affairs
14 Answers
Just what evidence does he have that will change the verdict on Princess Diana's death. Sorry to ask this but after 10 years he must have some new evidence to offer to the inquiry, otherwise why has it been re-opened. Let me say I do have sympathy for the loss of his son and I should imagine he finds the loss unbearable but the facts seem to be quite clear that it was a tragic accident
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Ric.ror. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I agree with you 100% i have also wondered why more than one goverment have refused him british nationality I wonder if this has anything to do with it
why have his lawyers asked for it to be put back 6 months cos of a lot of work to be done, surely after 10 years there isnt anything new?
He is clutching at straws because he has a long-running animosity with the royal family, which pre-dates any liasions between Diana and Dodi, and he is desperate to do anything he can to bring them down. Diana seeing Dodi was the best thing that ever happened to him, because it irritated a lot of people (which is probably why she did it in the first place), so for them to both die so soon after the affair became public was probably too much for his inflated ego to take.
Question Author
What is the reason for the long standing animosity with the royal family. I do not want to appear to be knocking Mr Al Fayed because he has lost his only son something I suspect he will never recover from - would anyone - but I fail to see what the evidence can be that he is bringing to trial. I have noticed that Mike Mansfeild (I think thats his name) is heading Mr Fayed's case!!!!!!!!
There has been an enquiry, but there's never been an inquest, and this is what is going to take place now, so the case isn't being re-opened as such. I have no idea what information Mr Al Fayed has, but no one can deny there are a lot of unanswered questions. In the light of, say, the Dr David Kelly enquiry, I wouldn't necessarily trust the 'official' line. I feel that would be rather naive.
Question Author
Well what are the 'unanswered questions'
Read the reports.
Question Author
do you know what - life is just a little bit tooooooo short.
Why ask then?
Speaking about Princess Diana -

Rearrange the letters of Princess Diana and you get

Ascend in Paris

or

End is a car spin

Pure coincidence?

i have 100% respect for mr al fayed as a parent he isnt leaving no stone unturned and what parent wouldnt?i think certain members the establishment are feeling very uncomfortable.he just needs more time to get all the evidence together this is his last chance to try and find out exactly what happened to his son.isnt it strange how the surviving bodyguard is rarely mentioned?memory loss is is excuse if i were al fayed id be banging on his door im afraid...........
Mr.Fayed has accused the Duke of Edinburgh of being a nazi and instigating the car crash.What I really can't understand is the fact that it was Mr. Fayed who ordered the change of driver and car etc.So who instigated what?
Did you know that if you rearrange the letters of 'Sir Prize' you get:

what a load of old tripe

Coincidence? Gets you thinking doesn't it....
Conspiracy therories are for people with little to do and little trust in people. Just because the letters in her name can be rearranged into different words, doesnt mean that from the moment she was made a "Lady", she was destined to die in a car crash!

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Mohammed Al Fayed

Answer Question >>