News1 min ago
PIAT - fairly useless anti tank weapon
How come the British forces in WW2 had the PIAT when the US had the Bazooka and the Germans had the PanzerSchreck?
Having just watched a doco about Jeremy Clarkson's VC father in law who disabled a number of Tigers ( Tigers! ) with the fairly pathetic PIAT, it makes you wonder how many Tank Kills the British Infantry got in WW2?
Having just watched a doco about Jeremy Clarkson's VC father in law who disabled a number of Tigers ( Tigers! ) with the fairly pathetic PIAT, it makes you wonder how many Tank Kills the British Infantry got in WW2?
Answers
1 to 2 of 2
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by airbolt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It did have it's uses if aimed at the side of the tank, and not the front, it could also be used against soft skin vehicles, (armoured cars, etc) , it was smaller and lighter than it's German + American counterparts making it useful for close quarter and urban fighting by being able to create a hole in the side of a house to allow Infantry in, (the same tacticts are used today using a much bigger weapon called the LAW 90).
1 to 2 of 2
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.