Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Emmerdale
Ok now i realise its ONLY a soap..........BUT this storyline about Marlon winning all that money in the bookies and the bookie refusing to acknowledge the win and eating the betting slip therefore destoying any proof seems hardly likely? just wondered what would happen if a bookmaker DID decide to adopt this policy whenever he didnt fancy paying out a large sum? ; )
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by curlyperm. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Mr M who is a regular at the bookies said the betting slip you are given back to collect your winnings(if you win) has to go through the machine, if it doesn't and they are caught they loose their license.So the story line is rubbish! You would think they would check these story lines were authentic wouldn't you!!
'Mr M', referred to above, probably uses one of the big chains of bookmakers. They operate a machine-based system, purely for their own security. (It has nothing to do with any legal obligations).
Any bookmaker can refuse to pay out winnings without giving a reason, as can firms like Littlewoods who run football pools. Under the Gambling Act 1845, gambling debts are unenforceable in law. If Marlon (in Emmerdale) had been able to keep the betting slip, he could have used it to 'kick up a stink' with the local press but the police wouldn't be able to help him (because the bookmaker hadn't breached any criminal legislation) and he would have no right to sue for his winnings.
Chris
Any bookmaker can refuse to pay out winnings without giving a reason, as can firms like Littlewoods who run football pools. Under the Gambling Act 1845, gambling debts are unenforceable in law. If Marlon (in Emmerdale) had been able to keep the betting slip, he could have used it to 'kick up a stink' with the local press but the police wouldn't be able to help him (because the bookmaker hadn't breached any criminal legislation) and he would have no right to sue for his winnings.
Chris