Donate SIGN UP

Use of black and white

Avatar Image
Peter Moss | 08:01 Fri 22nd Jun 2007 | Politics
5 Answers
Apartheid was based upon the colour of a person's skin. This is racism. Surely it is time to stop referring to people as black or white?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Peter Moss. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Whenever someone is mentioned in the papers or on the news their age and sex is always mentioned. Well that's just ageism and sexism!

Not quite sure what my point is though.
if people are still being discriminated against on the basis of skin colour (and it's not the only basis on which this happens), better to acknowledge it than pretend it didn't happen?
Surely calling somebody black or white is just descriptive. Like sayign somebody is tall, short, fat or thin...? Or having black hair, brown hair etc.

How would you describe somebody you didn't know?
Calling somebody black isn't racist; suggesting they are in some way inferior because they are black is racist.

And yes, the same applies if you substitute white for black in the above (just to keep the perpetually indignant happy - sigh).
I can see how the use of Black & white could be perceived as racist. Firstly, the terms are not simply descriptive; nobody, except perhaps an albino, has completely 'white' skin, and nobody has completely black skin. To turn these terms into a binary opposition somehow implies that the terms are incommensurable.

Secondly, creating binary oppositions in language, some linguistic structuralists or poststructuralists might argue, often leads to the valorization of one of the terms and the minoritization of the other, thus creating a structural bias in our language, and consequently in our perception, experience, behaviour, attitudes and whatever, which degrades the minor term, leading to a cultural bias.

Thirdly, distinguishing between 'black' and 'white' can lead to the exclusion of those who are perceived as mixed race ( this arguably includes everyone to some degree, but in some it is perhaps more noticable than others, that is if they are closer to the centre rather than edges of the spectrum). The binarization of these terms leads some people, caught in the middle, to be excluded from both terms, and possibly in consequence can lead to cultural/social exclusion, that is they may be denied cultural belonging from both 'black' and 'white' cultural groups.

Of course this all relies on the assumption that language affects our perception, experience, attitudes and behaviour within society, rather than language being a purely descriptive, transparent medium for communication. I would argue, however, that the existence of people who do not fit into either of these categories logically proves that language is not purely descriptive, and does contain inherent bias.

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Use of black and white

Answer Question >>