Question Author
Thanks looneytunes for your answer
In this case the evidence bundle does not contain the copy/ print of the evidence to prove the law was broken.
The defendents solicitor has now received the full file which does have the said document so I supose this counts as disclosure.
It seems stupid when the Criminal Justice act states that any evidence to be relied on in court must be declared to their opponent , that a precis without some evidence can be issued. Also what a waste of paper giving the magistate the bundle and the full file let alone the wages to the civil servant involved