ChatterBank2 mins ago
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Jasper01. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Pffff... Disclaimers on emails are to all intents and purposes worthless from a legal perspective. They're only useful to notify recipients where they should re-send document if recieved in error.
Email is simply a medium; what is important is the content and an organisation should ascribe the same value to a particular type of content regardless of content.
Now, there could be an issue about legal admissibility, which arises where it is not always possible to prove that a document contains an unaltered version of the content. If you can't then a judge would be entitled to refuse to accept a document into proceedings.
Without more detail about precisely you want to know, it's difficult to give an exact answer.
Email is simply a medium; what is important is the content and an organisation should ascribe the same value to a particular type of content regardless of content.
Now, there could be an issue about legal admissibility, which arises where it is not always possible to prove that a document contains an unaltered version of the content. If you can't then a judge would be entitled to refuse to accept a document into proceedings.
Without more detail about precisely you want to know, it's difficult to give an exact answer.
It largely depends what you mean by a legal document. As Wald says its the content not the fact that its an email that is important.
If you asking whether it would admissable in court proceedings that is a totally different scenario. The short answer is it could be, but it really would depend on the circumstances
If you asking whether it would admissable in court proceedings that is a totally different scenario. The short answer is it could be, but it really would depend on the circumstances